GROUNDWATER QUALITY STATUS AND HYDROCHEMICAL VULNERABILITY AROUND THE SURJAGARH OPENCAST IRON ORE MINING BELT, GADCHIROLI DISTRICT OF MAHARASHTRA (INDIA)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Groundwater quality in mineral-rich hard-rock regions is strongly influenced by natural water–rock interaction, terrain conditions, and land-use disturbance associated with mining activity. The present study assesses groundwater quality status and hydrochemical vulnerability around the Surjagarh opencast iron ore mining belt using hydrochemical parameters, BIS drinking-water comparison, district-background comparison, and station-wise vulnerability classification. The analysis focused on selected parameters including pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, total hardness, calcium, magnesium, chloride, sulphate, bicarbonate, sodium, iron, uranium, and total alkalinity. Results showed that groundwater in the study area is generally near-neutral to mildly alkaline, with pH ranging from 7.00 to 8.70. Electrical conductivity indicated moderate dissolved ionic load, while total hardness and magnesium emerged as the dominant groundwater-quality concerns. Total hardness exceeded the BIS acceptable limit in 77.9% of analyzed records, and magnesium exceeded the acceptable limit in 61.0% of records. Calcium and TDS showed localized exceedance, whereas chloride, sulphate, and iron remained within permissible limits. Vulnerability classification indicated that most records fall within moderate to high vulnerability classes. The study identifies hardness, magnesium, localized calcium, and TDS as principal contributors to groundwater-quality vulnerability and emphasizes the need for systematic groundwater monitoring around the Surjagarh mining belt.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
References
2.Bureau of Indian Standards. (2012). IS 10500:2012 Drinking water—Specification (2nd rev.). Bureau of Indian Standards.
3.Central Ground Water Board. (2025). Ground water quality: Manual chemical parameters, Maharashtra, 1961–2025 [Data set]. National Water Data Portal, National Water Informatics Centre, Government of India.
4.Gautam, V. K., Kothari, M., Al-Ramadan, B., Singh, P. K., Upadhyay, H., Pande, C. B., ... & Yaseen, Z. M. (2024). Groundwater quality characterization using an integrated water quality index and multivariate statistical techniques. PLoS one, 19(2), e0294533.
5.Giri, S., Tiwari, A. K., Mahato, M. K., & Singh, A. K. (2023). Spatio-temporal variations of metals in groundwater from an iron mining impacted area: Assessing sources and human health risk. Total Environment Research Themes, 8, 100070.
6.Jareda, G., Mahapatra, S. P., & Dhekne, P. Y. (2018). Water quality index, heavy metal pollution index and seasonal variation correlation of groundwater of Bailadila iron ore mine area and its peripherals: Dantewada district, Chhattisgarh, India. Desalination and Water Treatment, 101, 1-10.
7.Kausher, R., Singh, R., Sinha, A. K., Sethy, S. N., Kumar, S., Pandey, S., ... & Mohamed, A. (2023). Assessing impacts of mining-induced land use changes on groundwater and surface water quality using isotopic and hydrogeochemical signatures. Sustainability, 15(14), 11041.
8.Kumar, A., & Krishna, A. P. (2021). Groundwater quality assessment using geospatial technique based water quality index (WQI) approach in a coal mining region of India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(12), 1126.
9.Li, C., Gui, H., Guo, Y., Chen, J., Li, J., Xu, J., & Yu, H. (2022). Study on the influence of mining activities on the quality of deep karst groundwater based on multivariate statistical analysis and hydrochemical analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 17042.
10.Liu, Q., Zhang, Z., Zhang, B., Mu, W., Zhang, H., Li, Y., & Xu, N. (2021). Hydrochemical analysis and identification of open-pit mine water sources: A case study from the Dagushan iron mine in Northeast China. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 23152.
11.Luo, A., Wang, G., Dong, S., Wang, H., Shi, Z., Ji, Z., & Xue, J. (2022). Effect of large-scale mining drainage on groundwater hydrogeochemical evolution in semi-arid and arid regions. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 926866.
12.Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. (2023). Environmental clearance for Surjagarh Iron Ore Mine of Lloyds Metals & Energy Limited, Gadchiroli district, Maharashtra (EC Identification No. EC23A001MH116618; File No. J-11015/348/2005-IA.II[M]). Government of India.
13.Naskar, S., Mandal, D., Biswas, B., & Mukherjee, C. (2025). Hydro chemical assessment of groundwater quality using pollution index, quality indexes, fuzzy-GIS, graphical and multivariate techniques from a mining region of Eastern India. Discover Water, 5(1), 48.
14.Rajmohan, N., Senthilkumar, M., & Alqarawy, A. M. (2025). Hydrogeochemistry and its relationship with land use pattern and monsoon in hard rock aquifer. Applied Water Science, 15(3), 57.
15.Ram, A., Tiwari, S. K., Pandey, H. K., Chaurasia, A. K., Singh, S., & Singh, Y. V. (2021). Groundwater quality assessment using water quality index (WQI) under GIS framework. Applied Water Science, 11(2), 46.
16.Roy, B., Pramanik, M., & Manna, A. K. (2023). Hydrogeochemistry and quality evaluation of groundwater and its impact on human health in North Tripura, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(1), 39.
17.Singh, G., & Kamal, R. K. (2017). Heavy metal contamination and its indexing approach for groundwater of Goa mining region, India. Applied water science, 7(3), 1479-1485.